Can I see it?
Where to See Isaac Levitan: Evening Bells, Vladimirka and the Last Lake
Levitan could make a road remember the people who had walked it. His landscapes in Moscow and St Petersburg move between human history and weather that seems indifferent to it.
2. november 2026 · 7 min. læsning · ART WIKI’s redaktion
There is no column of prisoners on the road. In Vladimirka, Levitan leaves the route towards Siberian exile almost empty, making the landscape carry the history. A small pilgrim stands beside the broad track; lesser paths merge with it. The Tretyakov Gallery painting does not give us an episode to witness and then leave behind. It offers a distance to imagine walking. That decision, to remove the obvious action, makes the road harder to forget.
Moscow: a road the painter could not simply leave
Levitan painted the canvas in 1892, working from impressions gathered in Vladimir province. That September he himself had to leave Moscow during the campaign expelling Jewish residents. Friends secured permission for his return in December. The histories are not identical, but the coincidence makes an easy reading of the picture as merely melancholy scenery inadequate. After the painting failed to sell on exhibition, he gave it to the Tretyakov Gallery in 1894. The landscape entered a public collection through the decision of a man whose own right to remain in the city had been challenged.
A different route leads across water in Evening Bells, also in the Tretyakov. Its monastery draws on more than one encounter, including the Savvino-Storozhevsky monastery near Zvenigorod and a monastery near Yuryevets on the Volga. The painting travelled to the 1893 Chicago World's Fair under a title describing a monastery before a feast day. It entered the Tretyakov in 1918. What feels like one remembered evening is a constructed place with an international exhibition history, rather than a view waiting unchanged at a particular bend in the river.

The crossing matters more than an architectural inventory. Near shore and far shore do not offer the same kind of space: one is where the viewer stands, the other where the buildings collect the remaining light. You can follow the boats without needing to invent a passenger's story. Levitan gives enough signs of human passage to make the separation felt. The title supplies sound, but the paint has to do its work silently, through distances and intervals.
The Volga: returning after a bad first visit
The river initially disappointed him. In spring 1887, cold rain and wind made the Volga difficult to paint. He returned the following year with fellow painters Alexei Stepanov and Sofia Kuvshinnikova, settling in Plyos, and worked there again in 1889. Moscow's After the Rain, Plyos and Evening, Golden Plyos grew from that renewed acquaintance. An encounter that could have ended with bad weather instead became a sustained working relationship with a place.
Compare the two paintings as different answers to the same question: how much of a town can light hold together? The wet roofs and river of the first resist an easy division between useful settlement and picturesque surroundings. The second looks down from a height, letting the far bank soften into evening. Neither requires a crowd to make the landscape inhabited. Buildings and boats are sufficient. The weather changes how near or far that habitation feels, even when the geography remains recognisable.
Moscow again: a transplanted church and a waiting horse
The church in Above Eternal Peace did not simply stand where Levitan painted it. He combined impressions of the Udomlya area with a wooden church studied in Plyos. Kuvshinnikova recalled playing Beethoven, especially the funeral march from the Eroica, while he worked. Before the 1894 exhibition, Pavel Tretyakov bought the canvas. The little building and cemetery give the broad water a human measure; the sky threatens to make that measure insufficient. Knowing the scene was assembled makes its emotional scale more deliberate.

A horse called Dianka waits outside the house in March. Levitan painted it at the Gorka estate in 1895, where he was staying with Anna Turchaninova after his relationship with Kuvshinnikova ended. The yellow house belonged to the Turchaninov family. The scene's brightness need not become a simple report on his happiness: the waiting horse, open door and remaining snow make their own arrangement of suspended activity. The painting gives spring a particular yard and a particular animal, rather than announcing it through an abstract change of season.
Water replaces the yard's firm ground in Spring, High Water. A boat and distant houses register human use of the flooded landscape without supplying a central figure. Kozma Soldatenkov bought the painting in 1897; it reached the Tretyakov in 1925 through the dissolution of the Rumyantsev Museum. Its reflective stillness should not make the trees feel immaterial. Their trunks stand in water that has temporarily altered the boundary between land and river. A familiar place has become accessible by a different means.
St Petersburg: the lake left unfinished
Levitan's death in 1900 left Lake. Russia unfinished. The Russian Museum painting first appeared publicly at his posthumous exhibition in 1901. He had recently returned to the Moscow school as a teacher, after studying there himself under Savrasov and Polenov. The unfinished canvas belongs to a life still occupied by work and teaching, not to a final pronouncement neatly prepared for posterity. Its incompletion is worth remembering before treating every cloud as a farewell.
The lake combines several studies rather than reproducing one exact panorama. Levitan considered calling it Russia, but worried that the title sounded too grand. Sunlit water and clouds carry that larger ambition without resolving it into a single message. If you can visit only one city for Levitan, Moscow gives the fuller sequence in this selection. In either museum, allow a gap between the darker pictures and the bright ones; sit down for a few minutes before asking your eyes to make the change.
På forsiden: Evening Bells — Isaac Levitan. Museum open access
Mere at læse
Where to see an artist →Can I see it?
Where to See Jean-François Millet: The Gleaners, The Angelus and the Work Behind Them
Millet's peasants have been treated as threats, national treasures and reassuring household images. The paintings themselves are harder to settle into any one of those roles.
Can I see it?
Where to See Fra Angelico: The Annunciation and the Altarpieces That Came Apart
An angel recovered his wing in Madrid; a Florentine altarpiece spent decades separated from its lower panels. Following Fra Angelico means following the repairs, removals and reunions that changed his pictures.
Can I see it?
Where to See Petrus Christus: A Painted Fly, a Goldsmith and a Girl Without a Name
A fly lands on a frame that is itself painted. Petrus Christus makes you look twice, then sends you hunting for the people behind his portraits.