Пляска Тамары, Mikhail Vrubel, 1890-1891
Mikhail Vrubel, portraitMikhail Vrubel1856–1910

Пляска Тамары

1890-1891 · Drawing · 49 × 32.9 cm

Can I see it?

Unknown

Where is “Пляска Тамары” now? Collection: Tretyakov Gallery, Moscow. Unknown.

Tretyakov Gallery

Moscow, Russia

The owner is known; whether it is on view today is not.

In this state since
Source
The museum

About the work

Museum text in Russian

Жанр иллюстрации во времена Врубеля предъявлял к художникам специфические требования. Ценились повествовательность, точность типажей, деталей, достоверность этнографического колорита. Свобода художника была также скована возможностями полиграфии – все изображения требовалось исполнять только черной акварелью и белилами, с минимальными нюансировками тона, с четкими границами пятен и ясными линиями.

Read on

Лист «Пляска Тамары» на первый взгляд соответствует этим запросам: грузинская экзотика пейзажа, одежд, музыкальных инструментов, пластики национального танца. Но все это с бытовой точки зрения мало интересует художника. Врубель не столько следует сюжету, сколько стремится воплотить то, что не поддается изображению, – поэтическую материю лермонтовского стиха. Из скудости инструментария иллюстратора он извлекает фантастические возможности: каждое касание кисти, каждый штрих имеют собственную индивидуальную форму, плотность, интенсивность тона, энергию. Сочетание пятен и штрихов порождает сложные ритмические узоры, изысканные созвучия.

Tretyakov Gallery

Details

Accession number
3547

In the catalog

Sources

In the life of Mikhail Vrubel

The whole life
  1. second half of the 1880s

    His father sees the first “Demon”, which is destroyed

    While painting Kiev’s churches, Vrubel was simultaneously turning to the image of the Demon. His father, visiting Kiev, was horrified by his son’s poverty — “no warm blanket, no warm coat” — and disgusted by the first version of the “Demon”; the artist destroyed the painting, as he did much else he made in Kiev.

  2. second half of the 1880s

    His designs for St Volodymyr’s Cathedral rejected

    Prakhov brought Vrubel into the decoration of St Volodymyr’s Cathedral but rejected his own designs — among them at least six versions of “The Lamentation at the Tomb”: their originality would have wrecked the unity of the ensemble, and for such murals, Prakhov remarked, one would have to build a church “in a completely special style”. Vrubel was left with minor work — ornaments and “The Days of Creation” in one of the ceiling panels after sketches by the Svedomsky brothers.

  3. September 1889

    The move to Moscow

    After rushing to Kazan to his gravely ill father, in September Vrubel went to Moscow to see friends — and stayed for fifteen years; most likely he was drawn there by an infatuation with a circus horsewoman. He settled in Konstantin Korovin’s studio on Dolgorukovskaya Street; a plan for the two of them to work together with Serov came to nothing, as relations with Serov did not work out.

  4. December 1889

    Meeting Savva Mamontov

    Korovin introduced Vrubel to the industrialist and patron Savva Mamontov, and in December the artist moved into his house on Sadovaya-Spasskaya Street. Mamontov became his steady patron, though Mamontov’s wife openly called Vrubel “a blasphemer and a drunkard”, and the painter soon moved to a rented flat.

  5. July 1890

    Abramtsevo: a passion for ceramics

    Having come to Abramtsevo to bid farewell to his friend A. Mamontov, who died on 20 July aged 22, Vrubel stayed on and fell passionately for ceramics — soon he proudly wrote to his sister that he was running a “factory of tiles and terracotta decorations”. For the first time in his life he was no longer a hanger-on in wealthy households and earned well: stove designs, a majolica chapel over A. Mamontov’s grave, a design for an extension to the Mamontovs’ Moscow house.

  6. 10 April 1891

    Illustrations for Lermontov’s “Demon”

    The jubilee two-volume Lermontov, illustrated by 18 artists of whom Vrubel alone was completely unknown to the public, was passed by the censor on 10 April 1891. The press savaged Vrubel’s black-watercolour sheets for their “coarseness, ugliness, caricature and absurdity”, and he became convinced that “true art” is understood by almost no one.

All works

From the collection of Tretyakov Gallery

Museum page